This article is about helping committees and body corporate managers to help avoid unlawful by-laws.
In part 1 of our by-law series, we discussed what by-laws are legislated to provide for.
In part 2 of our by-law series, we discussed the first 4 limitations of what by-laws cannot provide for.
Sections 180 and 181 of the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (Qld) (BCCMA) set out 8 limitations for by-laws. In part 3 we address, with examples, the final 4 limitations of what by-laws cannot provide for.
Limitation 5
“A by-law (other than an exclusive use by-law) must not impose a monetary liability on the owner or occupier of a lot included in a community titles scheme.”
This limitation is commonly contravened as there are many by-laws which seek to:
- impose costs upon owners or occupiers for by-law breaches; or
- set a levy recovery process.
These by-laws are all invalid. A by-law cannot create a monetary liability for an owner or occupier – unless it relates to an exclusive use by-law.
The BCCMA has its own specific mechanisms for monetary liabilities to be recovered from owners or occupiers. Those mechanisms can be enforced separately to any by-law enforcement action.
Limitation 6
“A by-law must not be oppressive or unreasonable, having regard to the interests of all owners and occupiers of lots included in the scheme and the use of the common property for the scheme.”
This is the catch-all that is often disputed in the Office of the Commissioner for Body Corporate and Community Management.
Like any reasonableness argument it is often subjective as to whether a particular by-law is unreasonable.
However, some common by-laws that are invalidated on this basis include:
- by-laws requiring all pets to be carried across common property irrespective of their size;
- by-laws imposing a particular hard flooring rating is attained (if the specified rating is unattainable); and
- by-laws that ban otherwise lawful conduct (which is similar to what we discussed in part 1).
Limitation 7
“A by-law must not include a provision that has no force or effect under the Building Act 1975, chapter 8A, part 2.”
This is a very specific limitation that prevents a by-law seeking to preserve the aesthetics of a building at the expense of interfering with the sustainable housing provisions of the Building Act 1975 (Qld) such as:
- roof colours with certain solar absorptance values;
- energy efficient windows;
- house orientation, floor area and minimum bathroom / bedroom requirements;
- solar hot water or solar panel installations.
Limitation 8
Section 181 of the legislation provides that a by-law cannot interfere with the rights of a person with a disability who has the right to be accompanied by a guide, hearing or assistance dog to:
- be on the common property or a lot; and
- keep the dog in their lot.
Conclusion
Too often by-laws do not comply with limitations contained in sections 180 and 181 of the BCCMA.
Unfortunately for all involved, this only comes to light when a committee tries to enforce an unlawful by-law. By then it is too late and little can be done until the by-law is corrected.
Please contact our dedicated body corporate team if you need any assistance with body corporate by-laws for a scheme. We can review your by-laws for compliance and help the committee proactively address any unlawful by-laws.
Todd Garsden
Mahoneys
E: [email protected]
P: 07 3007 3753
This post appears in Strata News #559.
This article has been republished with permission from the author and first appeared on the Mahoneys website.
Have a question about Queensland By-Laws or something to add to the article? Leave a comment below.
Read next:
- QLD: Q&A Renting, Selling or Reallocation – Exclusive Use of Common Property
- QLD: Bodies Corporate and AirBnb
Visit our Strata By-Laws and Legislation OR Strata Legislation QLD
Looking for strata information concerning your state? For state-specific strata information, take a look here.
After a free PDF of this article? Log into your existing LookUpStrata Account to download the printable file. Not a member? Simple – join for free on our Registration page.
joan mitchell says
Thank you very much for your articles, they are very helpful.
I find By-laws somewhat confusing. We have By-laws under the BCCM Act and By-laws of the BMS.
Some By-laws are contained in both of these, while some are in one but not in the other. Do we need to follow both of them? What happens if they conflict?
Regards, Joan Mitchell Qld
Todd Garsden - Mahoneys says
Hi Joan
Thank you for your feedback – it is appreciated.
This series of articles only discussed by-laws applicable in the community management statement.
Any requirements set out in legislation are not necessarily additional by-laws but are statutory obligations.
Any requirements set out in a BMS are also not necessarily additional by-laws but are contractual obligations imposed usually on the body corporate.
All three types of “rules” are binding in different ways.
If you had any further detail on which rules you had concerns about or how they conflicted, I would be happy to assist further.